Thursday, September 04, 2008

Change Must Happen

On a little side note, today, I've been reading through a very good book by Thomas L. Friedman, titled, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twentieth-first Century, and I will take from a quote that was an answer to the author's question of what this Indian CEO's message was to the American people, in a world where the playing field has been flattened, and now India, China, Russia, and the like, are all beginning to thrive in a global technological economy. His response, that everybody [in America] needs "to wake up to the fact that there is a fundamental shift...in the way people are going to do business...everyone is going to have to improve themselves and be able to compete."
That's a pretty hard statement to swallow, but in my opinion it's true. I think I can completely and utterly relate to what he has said. America is very steeped in this conservative mindset, that what has worked in the past - basically becoming prosperous to due to innovation and setting the economic pace - will work now. But it won't! Don't you see? There is a new playing field, and Americans are still playing baseball, while the rest of the world is embracing a new and completely different game.
Unemployment is rising in America because there is way too much consequence to "doing your job", and not enough focus on making your job better, and more adaptable to the new way things work. In part people have been forced out of the workforce simply because they cannot compete on the new playing field. You have a lot of people who simply resist or are reluctant to learn new technological ways to do their job. Maybe, the greater part of the workforce is technologically inadequate or incompetent (I don't know you pick one), and because it is a majority force, it resists change in the workforce, because it feels threatened, and so they turn against those who want to change the game. Either play the right game or don't play it at all!
I look at it this way, if Americans do not begin to compete, instead of settling back into the comfort of a thriving past, then we will fail to sustain ourselves as an economic power in the global scene. We would also need to open our minds to new and better practices, those of which are very different than what we're used to, but in the end, we'd benefit from connecting ourselves to the global market, which is hardily driven by other nations at this point. We will soon be falling behind in the race, to the end of the pack.

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:02 PM

    You might want to check out a small, but interesting book, by Aronica and Ramdoo, "The World is Flat? A Critical Analysis of Thomas Friedman's New York Times Bestseller," which offers a counterperspective to Friedman's theory on globalization.

    It is a small book compared to the 600 page tome by Friedman, and aimed at the common man and students alike. As popular as the book may be, some reviewers assert that by what it leaves out, Friedman's book is dangerous. The authors point to the fact that there isn't a single table or data footnote in Friedman's entire book.

    "Globalization is the greatest reorganization of the world since the Industrial Revolution," says Aronica. Aronica and Ramdoo conclude by listing over twenty action items that point the way forward, for understanding the critical issues of globalization.

    You may want to see www.mkpress.com/flat
    and watch www.mkpress.com/flatoverview.html
    for an interesting counterperspective on Friedman's
    "The World is Flat".

    Also a really interesting 6 min wake-up call: Shift Happens! www.mkpress.com/ShiftExtreme.html

    There is also a companion book listed: Extreme Competition: Innovation and the Great 21st Century Business Reformation
    www.mkpress.com/extreme
    http://www.mkpress.com/Extreme11minWMV.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the recommendation. I have studied a lot on this topic, and have come to find that the data tends to be skewed by an environment that counteracts what Friedman discusses. The reason for this is that Friedman is not discussing what the current economy is doing, but rather suggesting how it should operate in order to follow through with globalized business ethic, and thus facts are irrelevant.
    We as a society must embrace globalization in affairs of our time. Technology, whether you like it or not, is creating a global market. America must recognize this on the whole, or else we will be like India or China 20 years ago.

    ReplyDelete